Novel Peritoneal Sclerosis Rat Model Developed by Administration of Bleomycin and Lansoprazole.

In our preliminary experiment, peritoneal sclerosis likely induced by peritoneal dialysis was unexpectedly observed in the livers of rats given bleomycin and lansoprazole. We examined whether this peritoneal thickening around the liver was time-dependently induced by administration of both drugs. Male Wistar rats were injected with bleomycin and/or lansoprazole for 2 or 4 weeks. The 3YB-1 cell line derived from rat fibroblasts was treated by bleomycin and/or lansoprazole for 24 h. The administration of both drugs together, but not individually, thickened the peritoneal tissue around the liver. There was accumulation of collagen fibers, macrophages, and eosinophils under mesothelial cells. Expressions of Col1a1, Mcp1 and Mcp3 genes were increased in the peritoneal tissue around the liver and in 3YB-1 cells by the administration of both drugs together, and Opn genes had increased expressions in this tissue and 3YB-1 cells. Mesothelial cells indicated immunoreactivity against both cytokeratin, a mesothelial cell marker, and αSMA, a fibroblast marker, around the livers of rats given both drugs. Administration of both drugs induced the migration of macrophages and eosinophils and induced fibrosis associated with the possible activation of fibroblasts and the possible promotion of the mesothelial-mesenchymal transition. This might become a novel model of peritoneal sclerosis for peritoneal dialysis.

Vonoprazan versus lansoprazole in erosive esophagitis - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the mainstay of treatment in erosive esophagitis (EE). An alternative to PPIs in EE is Vonoprazan, a potassium competitive acid blocker. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing vonoprazan to lansoprazole. METHODS: Multiple databases searched through November 2022. Meta-analysis was performed to assess endoscopic healing at two, four and eight weeks, including for patients with severe EE (Los Angeles C/D). Serious adverse events (SAE) leading to drug discontinuation were assessed. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. RESULTS: Four RCTs with 2208 patients were included in the final analysis. Vonoprazan 20 mg once-daily was compared to lansoprazole 30 mg once-daily dosing. Among all patients, at two and eight weeks post-treatment, vonoprazan resulted in significantly higher rates of endoscopic healing as compared to lansoprazole, risk ratios (RR) 1.1, p<0.001 and RR 1.04, p=0.03. The same effect was not observed at four weeks, RR 1.03 (CI 0.99-1.06, I2=0%) following therapy. Among patients with severe EE, vonoprazan resulted in higher rates of endoscopic healing at two weeks, RR 1.3 (1.2-1.4, I2=47%), p=<0.001, at four weeks, RR 1.2 (1.1-1.3, I2=36%), p=<0.001 and at eight weeks post-treatment, RR 1.1 (CI 1.03-1.3, I2=79%), p=0.009. We found no significant difference in the overall pooled rate of SAE and pooled rate of adverse events leading to drug discontinuation. Finally, the overall certainty of evidence for our main summary estimates was rated as high (grade A). CONCLUSION: Based on limited number of published non-inferiority RCTs, our analysis demonstrates that among patients with EE, vonoprazan 20 mg once-daily dosing achieves comparable and in those with severe EE, higher endoscopic healing rates as compared to lansoprazole 30 mg once-daily dosing. Both drugs have a comparable safety profile.

Efficacy and Safety of Keverprazan Compared With Lansoprazole in the Treatment of Duodenal Ulcer: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Keverprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker for the treatment of acid-related disorders requiring potent acid inhibition. This study aimed to establish the noninferiority of keverprazan to lansoprazole in the treatment of patients with duodenal ulcer (DU). METHODS: In this phase III, double-blind, multicenter study, 360 Chinese patients with endoscopically confirmed active DU were randomized 1:1 to take either keverprazan (20 mg) or lansoprazole (30 mg) treatment for up to 6 weeks. The primary end point was DU healing rate at week 6. The secondary end point was DU healing rate at week 4. Symptom improvement and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Based on the full analysis set, the cumulative healing rates at week 6 were 94.4% (170/180) and 93.3% (166/178) for keverprazan and lansoprazole, respectively (difference: 1.2%; 95% confidence intervel: -4.0%-6.5%). At week 4, the respective healing rates were 83.9% (151/180) and 80.3% (143/178). In the per protocol set, the 6-week healing rates in keverprazan and lansoprazole groups were 98.2% (163/166) and 97.6% (163/167), respectively (difference: 0.6%; 95% confidence intervel: -3.1%-4.4%); the 4-week healing rates were respectively 86.8% (144/166) and 85.6% (143/167). Keverprazan was noninferior to lansoprazole in DU healing after the treatment for 4 and 6 weeks. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable among groups. DISCUSSION: Keverprazan 20 mg had a good safety profile and was noninferior to lansoprazole 30 mg once daily for DU healing.

Randomised clinical trial: 3-year interim analysis results of the VISION trial to evaluate the long-term safety of vonoprazan as maintenance treatment in patients with erosive oesophagitis.

BACKGROUND: VISION is a randomised, phase 4, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study conducted in 33 centres in Japan. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term safety of vonoprazan for maintenance treatment of healed erosive oesophagitis versus lansoprazole. METHODS: Patients with endoscopically diagnosed erosive oesophagitis were randomised 2:1 to once-daily vonoprazan 20 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg, for a 4- to 8-week healing phase. Patients with endoscopically confirmed healing entered a 260-week maintenance phase with a once-daily starting dose of vonoprazan 10 mg or lansoprazole 15 mg. Primary endpoint was change in gastric mucosal histopathology. RESULTS: Of 208 patients (vonoprazan, n = 139; lansoprazole, n = 69) entering the healing phase, 202 entered the maintenance phase (vonoprazan, n = 135; lansoprazole, n = 67). At 3 years, 109 vonoprazan-treated and 58 lansoprazole-treated patients remained on treatment. Histopathological evaluation of gastric mucosa showed that hyperplasia of parietal, foveolar and G cells was more common with vonoprazan than lansoprazole at week 156 of the maintenance phase. There was no marked increase in the occurrence of parietal, foveolar and G cell hyperplasia among patients in the vonoprazan group from week 48 to week 156. Histopathological evaluation of the gastric mucosa also showed no neoplastic changes in either group. No new safety issues were identified. CONCLUSIONS: In this interim analysis of VISION, no new safety concerns were identified in Japanese patients with healed erosive oesophagitis receiving vonoprazan or lansoprazole as maintenance treatment for 3 years. (CT.gov identifier: NCT02679508; JapicCTI-163153; Japan Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCTs031180040).

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Lansoprazole/Sodium Bicarbonate Immediate-release Capsules in Healthy Chinese Subjects: An Open, Randomized, Controlled, Crossover, Single-, and Multiple-dose Trial.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) differ in onset of action and bioavailability. This trial was conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an immediate-release capsule formulation containing lansoprazole 30 mg and sodium bicarbonate 1100 mg (T preparation) in healthy Chinese subjects. This was an open, single-center, randomized, single and multiple oral doses, and two-period crossover study in 30 healthy subjects. After single- and multiple-dose oral administration, blood samples were obtained and lansoprazole concentration in serum was measured for pharmacokinetic analysis. Meanwhile, the intragastric pH was monitored continuously to evaluate the pharmacodynamics of the investigational drugs. The Tmax of the T preparation was 0.5 hours, while the Tmax of the R preparation was 1.5 hours after multiple doses, which indicated that the absorption speed of the T preparation was significantly faster than that of the R preparation. The same characteristics also existed after single-dose administration. The area under the curve (AUC)ss of the T preparation was bio-equivalent to that of the R preparation under steady state. The time percentage of intragastric pH > 4.0 for the T preparation was higher than that of the R preparation after 1 hour for both single- and multiple-dose. It suggested compared with R preparation, the time percentage of intragastric pH > 4.0 met the criteria for superiority after 1 hour administration for the T preparation. In addition, no serious adverse events occurred in this study. Across this study, the T preparation was better than the R preparation at improving drug absorption and increasing intragastric pH, and had a favorable safety profile.

[Proton-pump inhibitor use and hyponatremia].

AIM: Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used. However, reports of their adverse effects are increasing. Older patients are prone to developing hyponatremia due to various factors. The special environment of a geriatric healthcare facility tends to subject these patients to long-term medication use. Therefore, we hypothesized that nursing home residents receiving PPIs will present hyponatremia. METHODS: The residents of Shonan Silver Garden, a long-term care health facility for older adults, were divided into two groups: a control group (n=61) which did not receive proton-pump inhibitors and a PPI group (n=29), which received proton-pump inhibitors for at least 6 months. The PPI group was further divided into the lansoprazole group (LPZ group) and the other PPI group. Other PPI users were excluded due to small numbers. The blood test results were compared between the control and LPZ groups. In the LPZ group, blood samples were taken 1 month after the discontinuation of lansoprazole, and serum Na level was compared to the level before discontinuation. RESULTS: Blood Na levels in the PPI were lower than those in the control group, and hyponatremia (<136 mEq/L) was more frequent in the LPZ group than in the control group. There were no significant differences in other blood test parameters between the control and LPZ groups. At one month after the discontinuation of lansoprazole, serum Na levels were significantly increased; however, they remained lower than those in the control group. CONCLUSION: A higher rate of hyponatremia was induced in older residents of long-term care facilities who took lansoprazole for >6 months in comparison to those who did not take lansoprazole.

Pantoprazole-induced Thrombocytopenia: Unresponsive to Corticosteroid and Thrombocyte Concentrate Transfusion.

Introduction: Pantoprazole is a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) class drug that is widely used in the treatment of SRMD (stress-related mucosal disease in critical ill patients. PPI are one class of drugs used commonly both for treatment and prophylactic therapy for stress ulcers in intensive care unit (ICU). Case: We report a case of a 51-year old male who was referred to PKU Hospital. He was admitted to ICU with diagnosis of Hyperosmolar Hyperglymic State and bronchopneumonia. Thrombocytopenia was noted in admission. There was more than 70% decrease in platelet count after initiation of pantoprazole. Patient received Thrombocyte Concentrate (TC) transfusion and corticosteroid iv for several days, but only had minor increase in platelet count. The platelets recovered after stopping pantoprazole. Discussion: In the present case report, another exposures to parenteral pantoprazole in a dose of 40 mg once daily reproduced the same adverse drug reaction. In comparison to lansoprazole, thrombocytopenia from pantoprazole is more severe that necessitate TC transfusion and corticosteroid trial. However, in the present case, TC transfusion and corticosteroid fail to escalate platelet count. This finding suggests probability of non-immune mechanism of pantoprazole-induced thrombocytopenia. Conclusion: Pantoprazole may induce thrombocytopenia with new features that were immediately developed, resulting a decrease in platelet count >70%. The mechanism found in this case may be non-immune. Drug-induced thrombocytopenia is one of the rare complications that has to be kept in mind with the use of pantoprazole.

Evaluation of Potential Food Effects and Drug Interactions With Lansoprazole in Healthy Adult Volunteers Receiving Futibatinib.

Futibatinib, an oral, irreversible fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-4 inhibitor, is being evaluated for FGFR-aberrant tumors. Two open-label phase 1 studies evaluated the effects of high-fat, high-calorie food and concomitant proton pump inhibitors (PPIs; lansoprazole) on single-dose futibatinib (20 mg) pharmacokinetics and safety in healthy adults. In the food effect study (N  =  17), subjects received futibatinib under fed and fasted conditions, separated by a 7-day washout. In the PPI study (N  =  20), subjects received futibatinib alone, underwent a 2-day washout, and then received lansoprazole 60 mg once daily for 5 days, with futibatinib also administered on day 5. Under fed versus fasted conditions, futibatinib bioavailability was 11.2% lower (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity geometric mean ratio 88.8%; 90% confidence interval, 79.8%-98.9%), and median time to maximum plasma concentration was significantly delayed (4.0 vs 1.5 hours; P < .0001). There were no significant differences in futibatinib exposure between futibatinib plus lansoprazole and futibatinib alone. No serious adverse events occurred in either study. These findings suggest that food and PPIs are unlikely to have clinically meaningful impacts on futibatinib bioavailability. Thus, futibatinib may be used with or without food and concomitantly with acid-reducing agents.

Spontaneous reporting of adverse reactions related to proton pump inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed in all age groups, and their use is increasing. However, their safety profile has been frequently questioned. AIMS: The aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics of PPI-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported to the Italian spontaneous reporting system (SRS) database and relative to an Italian region (Sicily). METHODS: A 20-year observational, retrospective study was conducted, evaluating PPI-related ADR reports from Sicily between January 1st, 2001, and June 30th, 2021. The factors associated with ADR seriousness were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 148 spontaneous reports of ADRs related to PPIs were analyzed. Lansoprazole was the drug with the highest number of associated reports (30.87%). The most frequently reported ADRs were cutaneous (24.56%) and/or gastrointestinal manifestations (18.10%), the latter especially in the case of lansoprazole-related ADRs (p<0.006). The great majority of ADR reports were relative to on-label prescriptions. Serious ADRs were 39 (26.35%). Serious ADRs were more common in reports including omeprazole than in reports containing other PPIs (p<0.008) and in reports presenting PPIs combined with other drugs than in reports with PPI single therapies (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Most PPI-related ADRs are non-serious. Omeprazole and combination therapy seem to be associated with ADR seriousness.

Changes in bone turnover markers in adolescents with gastroesophageal reflux disease treated with lansoprazole.

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been suggested to lead to bone resorption, while the effects of PPIs on the bone mineral metabolism in children has received only limited attention in literature to date. The present study investigates whether lansoprazole alters bone turnover markers in adolescents with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Patients and methods: Included in the study were adolescents aged 16-18 with GERD and a healthy volunteers group. The GERD patient group was treated with lansoprazole 30 mg once daily for eight weeks. The serum calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), parathormone (PTH), 25 (OH) vitamin D, osteocalcin and urinary calcium, creatinine, deoxypyridinoline (DPD), collagen type-1 crosslinked C-telopeptide (CTX) and collagen type-1 crosslinked N-telopeptide (NTX) of both groups were studied before and after the end of the treatment. Results: A comparison of the 30 patients with GERD and the 30 volunteers revealed no significant difference in the serum calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, ALP, urinary calcium/creatinine ratio, 25 (OH) vitamin D and PTH levels measured before and after the lansoprazole treatment, while the osteocalcin, DPD, CTX and NTX values were found to be higher after treatment when compared to those at pre- treatment. Conclusions: The results of this study reveal that eight weeks of treatment with 30 mg lansoprazole daily increased the bone turnover markers of CTX, NTX, DPD and osteocalcin in adolescents aged 16-18.

Adverse event profiles of microscopic colitis in the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database.

Microscopic colitis (MC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that is characterized by nonbloody watery diarrhea. The epidemiology in Japan differs from that in Europe and the United States, but little information is available from epidemiological surveys of MC in Japan. This study aimed to provide a new hypothesis regarding the factors associated with MC by using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database. "Colitis microscopic" (preferred term code: 10056979) cases entered into the JADER database between 2004 and 2021 were analyzed. Of the 246,997 cases in the JADER database, 161 cases were observed to be associated with MC. A Weibull analysis revealed that the median onset duration of MC (interquartile range) was 72.5 (36.0‒125.5) days in lansoprazole users and 116.0 (60.3‒1089.0) days in aspirin users. A multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that MC was significantly associated with the female sex, as well as ages ≥ 60 years and drugs including lansoprazole, aspirin, and nicorandil. A subset analysis revealed that MC was positively associated with obesity in female cases. Our study cannot demonstrate a causal inference between MC and each drug; however, the findings suggest that MC was associated with nicorandil as well as with lansoprazole and aspirin.

Efficacy of keverprazan for duodenal ulcer: A phase II randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Considering the limitation of varying acid suppression of proton pump inhibitors, this study was aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and dose-effect relationship of keverprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, in the treatment of duodenal ulcer (DU) compared with lansoprazole. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, low-dose, high-dose, and positive-drug parallel-controlled study was conducted to verify the non-inferiority of keverprazan (20 or 30 mg) to lansoprazole of 30 mg once daily for 4 to 6 weeks and dose-effect relationship of keverprazan in the treatment of patients with active DU confirmed by endoscopy. RESULTS: Of the 180 subjects randomized, including 55 cases in the keverprazan_20 mg group, 61 cases in the keverprazan_30 mg group, and 64 cases in the lansoprazole_30 mg group, 168 subjects (93.33%) completed the study. The proportions of healed DU subjects in the keverprazan_20 mg, keverprazan_30 mg, and lansoprazole_30 mg groups were respectively 87.27%, 90.16%, and 79.69% at week 4 (P = 0.4595) and were respectively 96.36%, 98.36%, and 92.19% at week 6 (P = 0.2577). The incidence of adverse events in the keverprazan_20 mg group was lower than that in the lansoprazole_30 mg (P = 0.0285) and keverprazan_30 mg groups (P = 0.0398). CONCLUSIONS: Keverprazan was effective and non-inferior to lansoprazole in healing DU. Based on the comparable efficacy and safety data, keverprazan of 20 mg once daily is recommended for the follow-up study of acid-related disorders. (Trial registration number: ChiCTR2100043455.).

Acid suppressants use and risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in middle-aged and older adults.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Concerns regarding adverse events associated with the use of acid suppressants have increased. However, the impact of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) on the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains unknown. This study aimed to estimate the risk of ASCVD in association with the use of PPIs and H2RAs. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included participants without cardiovascular diseases or anti-hypertensive treatment at baseline (2006-2010) in the UK Biobank. The outcomes were ASCVD and each subtype (coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease, and ischemic stroke). The association was estimated by Cox proportional-hazards models. RESULTS: Among 316,730 individuals (aged 50-88 years), during a median of 12.5 years of follow-up, we documented 13,503 (4.3%) incident ASCVD. Regular PPIs use was associated with a higher risk of ASCVD (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.09-1.23) and every subtype of ASCVD. Among each type of PPIs, omeprazole (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.11-1.28), lansoprazole (HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02-1.22), and pantoprazole (HR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.00-1.97) were associated with a higher risk of ASCVD. Stratification analysis showed that PPIs use was associated with a higher risk of ASCVD among individuals without indications of medications for PPIs. In addition, use of H2RAs was not related to the risk of ASCVD (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.85-1.11). CONCLUSIONS: PPIs were associated with increased risk of ASCVD, particularly amongst participants without indications for medication. Our findings are of important practical significance and suggest that clinicians should be cautious in prophylactic use of PPIs.

Vonoprazan Triple and Dual Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection in the United States and Europe: Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Novel, effective treatments for Helicobacter pylori infection are needed. This study evaluated the efficacy of vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, vs standard treatment on H pylori eradication in the United States and Europe. METHODS: In a randomized, controlled, phase 3 trial, treatment-naïve adults with H pylori infection were randomized 1:1:1 to open-label vonoprazan dual therapy (20 mg vonoprazan twice daily; 1 g amoxicillin 3 times daily), or double-blind triple therapy twice a day (vonoprazan 20 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg; amoxicillin 1 g; clarithromycin 500 mg) for 14 days. The primary outcome was noninferiority in eradication rates in patients without clarithromycin- and amoxicillin-resistant strains (noninferiority margin = 10%). Secondary outcomes assessed superiority in eradication rates in clarithromycin-resistant infections, and in all patients. RESULTS: A total of 1046 patients were randomized. Primary outcome eradication rates (nonresistant strains): vonoprazan triple therapy 84.7%, dual therapy 78.5%, vs lansoprazole triple therapy 78.8% (both noninferior; difference 5.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.8 to 12.6; P < .001; difference -0.3%; 95% CI, -7.4 to 6.8; P = .007, respectively). Eradication rates in clarithromycin-resistant infections: vonoprazan triple therapy 65.8%, dual therapy 69.6%, vs lansoprazole triple therapy 31.9% (both superior; difference 33.9%; 95% CI, 17.7-48.1; P < .001; difference 37.7%; 95% CI, 20.5-52.6; P < .001, respectively). In all patients, vonoprazan triple and dual therapy were superior to lansoprazole triple therapy (80.8% and 77.2%, respectively, vs 68.5%, difference 12.3%; 95% CI, 5.7-18.8; P < .001; difference 8.7%; 95% CI, 1.9-15.4; P = .013). Overall frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between vonoprazan and lansoprazole regimens (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Both vonoprazan-based regimens were superior to proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy in clarithromycin-resistant strains and in the overall study population. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; NCT04167670.

The efficacy and safety of keverprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, in treating erosive oesophagitis: a phase III, randomised, double-blind multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Keverprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) with a strong acid-suppressive capacity that may provide clinical benefit in acid-related diseases. AIMS: This study aimed to explore the non-inferior efficacy and safety of keverprazan to lansoprazole in treating erosive oesophagitis (EO). METHODS: This was a phase III, randomised, double-blind multicentre study. Patients were randomised to receive keverprazan 20 mg once daily or lansoprazole 30 mg once daily for 4-8 weeks. EO healing rates and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the keverprazan group and the lansoprazole group. RESULTS: A total of 238 patients comprised the full analysis set (FAS) while 221 patients comprised the per-protocol set (PPS). For FAS analysis, the EO healing rates at week 8 were 95.8% (114/119) and 89.9% (107/119) for keverprazan and lansoprazole respectively. For PPS analysis, the EO healing rates at week 8 were 99.1% (110/111) and 92.7% (102/110) for keverprazan and lansoprazole respectively. Non-inferiority of keverprazan compared with lansoprazole according to EO healing rates at 8 weeks was demonstrated in both FAS (difference: 5.8% [95% CI: -0.6% to 12.3%]; p = 0.081) and PPS (difference: 6.1% [95% CI: 1.1%-11.2%]; p = 0.018) analysis. Drug-related AEs were reported in 34.5% (41/119) patients of the keverprazan group and 25.2% (30/119) patients of the lansoprazole group with no significant difference (p = 0.156). No severe AE happened in the keverprazan group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the non-inferior efficacy of keverprazan to lansoprazole in treating EO. The incidences of drug-related AEs were comparable between keverprazan and lansoprazole.

Vonoprazan non-inferior to lansoprazole in treating duodenal ulcer and eradicating Helicobacter pylori in Asian patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Duodenal ulcers, especially caused by increasingly drug-resistant Helicobacter pylori, are a concern in Asia. We compared oral vonoprazan versus lansoprazole for efficacy (healing duodenal ulcers) and safety in non-Japanese Asian patients. METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized (1:1), double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, non-inferiority study (April 5, 2017, to July 19, 2019), patients with ≥ 1 endoscopically confirmed duodenal ulcer, at 52 hospitals (China, South Korea, and Taiwan), received vonoprazan 20 mg once daily (QD) or lansoprazole 30 mg QD for 6 weeks maximum. Patients with H. pylori received bismuth-containing quadruple therapy including vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily (BID) or lansoprazole 30 mg BID, for 2 weeks, followed by vonoprazan or lansoprazole monotherapy QD (4 weeks maximum). Endpoints were endoscopically confirmed duodenal ulcer healing (Week 4/6; primary) and H. pylori eradication (4 weeks post-treatment; secondary); non-inferiority margins were -6% and -10%, using a two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Of 533 enrolled patients, one was lost to follow-up and one withdrew (full analysis set: 531 patients [vonoprazan, n = 263; lansoprazole, n = 268]; 85.4% = H. pylori positive). Vonoprazan was non-inferior to lansoprazole for duodenal ulcer healing (96.9% vs 96.5%; difference 0.4% [95% CI -3.00, 3.79]). H. pylori eradication rates were 91.5% (vonoprazan) and 86.8% (lansoprazole; difference 4.7% [95% CI -1.28, 10.69]). Vonoprazan and lansoprazole were well tolerated, with similar safety profiles, no new safety signals; no deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Vonoprazan was well tolerated and non-inferior to lansoprazole for duodenal ulcer healing and achieved H. pylori eradication above the clinically meaningful threshold (90%), in non-Japanese Asian patients.

Lansoprazole-induced osteoporosis via the IP3R- and SOCE-mediated calcium signaling pathways.

BACKGROUND: Many clinical studies have shown a correlation between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and osteoporosis or fractures. The purpose of this study was to establish a murine model of chronic oral PPI administration to verify whether PPIs caused bone metabolic impairment and investigate the relevant molecular mechanism underlying the effects of PPIs on MC3T3-E1 murine osteoblasts. METHODS: A lansoprazole-induced bone loss model was used to investigate the damaging effects of PPIs. In vivo, immunohistochemistry, Hematoxylin-Eosin (HE) staining, micro-CT analysis, and blood biochemical analyses were used to evaluate the effect of lansoprazole on bone injury in mice. In vitro, the effects of lansoprazole and related signaling pathways in MC3T3-E1 cells were investigated by CCK-8 assays, EdU assays, flow cytometry, laser confocal microscopy, patch clamping, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting. RESULTS: After 6 months of lansoprazole gavage in ICR mice, the micro-CT results showed that compared with that in the vehicle group, the bone mineral density (BMD) in the high-dose group was significantly decreased (P < 0.05), and the bone microarchitecture gradually degraded. Biochemical analysis of bone serum showed that blood calcium and phosphorus were both decreased (P < 0.01). We found that long-term administration of lansoprazole impaired skeletal function in mice. In vitro, we found that lansoprazole (LPZ) could cause calcium overload in MC3T3-E1 cells leading to apoptosis, and 2-APB, an inhibitor of IP3R calcium release channel and SOCE pathway, effectively blocked increase in calcium caused by LPZ, thus protecting cell viability. CONCLUSIONS: Longterm administration of LPZ induced osteoporotic symptoms in mice, and LPZ triggered calcium increases in osteoblasts in a concentration-dependent manner. Intracellular calcium ([Ca2+]i) persisted at a high concentration, thereby causing endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) and inducing osteoblast apoptosis.

Evaluation of safety and pharmacokinetics of bismuth-containing quadruple therapy with either vonoprazan or lansoprazole for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

AIMS: Helicobacter pylori (Hp) eradication plays a key role in the treatment and prevention of peptic ulcer diseases. Increasing clarithromycin resistance in Hp necessitates more effective treatments for eradication, such as bismuth-containing quadruple therapy. We aimed to compare the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of bismuth between vonoprazan- and lansoprazole-containing quadruple therapy in Hp-positive subjects. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study, Hp-positive subjects were randomised to receive vonoprazan- or lansoprazole-containing quadruple therapy. Each subject received vonoprazan 20 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg combined with bismuth 220 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily for 14 days. Blood sampling and urine collection for bismuth PK were conducted predose and up to 12 hours postdose at steady-state. The PK parameters of bismuth were derived using a noncompartmental method and compared between treatments. An exploratory breath test for Hp was conducted at screening and at the follow-up visit on day 42. Safety was assessed by adverse event monitoring, physical examinations, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiograms and clinical laboratory tests. RESULTS: A total of 30 subjects were randomised and 26 subjects completed the study (12 in the vonoprazan group and 14 in the lansoprazole group). The systemic exposure of bismuth in the 2 treatments was comparable (~5% difference). All subjects turned negative for Hp at the follow-up visit. No significant difference in safety profiles was noted between the 2 treatments. CONCLUSION: The systemic exposure of bismuth was similar between vonoprazan- and lansoprazole-containing quadruple therapy. Vonoprazan-containing quadruple therapy was safe and well tolerated.

Lansoprazole promotes cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury via enhancing tubular necroptosis.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is the main obstacle that limits the use of cisplatin in cancer treatment. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), the most commonly used class of medications for gastrointestinal complications in cancer patients, have been reported to cause adverse renal events. However, the effect of PPIs on cisplatin-induced AKI remains unclear. Herein, the effect and mechanism of lansoprazole (LPZ), one of the most frequently prescribed PPIs, on cisplatin-induced AKI were investigated in vivo and in vitro. C57BL/6 mice received a single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of cisplatin (18 mg/kg) to induce AKI, and LPZ (12.5 or 25 mg/kg) was administered 2 hours prior to cisplatin administration and then once daily for another 2 days via i.p. injection. The results showed that LPZ significantly aggravated the tubular damage and further increased the elevated levels of serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen induced by cisplatin. However, LPZ did not enhance cisplatin-induced tubular apoptosis, as evidenced by a lack of significant change in mRNA and protein expression of Bax/Bcl-2 ratio and TUNEL staining. Notably, LPZ increased the number of necrotic renal tubular cells compared to that by cisplatin treatment alone, which was further confirmed by the elevated necroptosis-associated protein expression of RIPK1, p-RIPK3 and p-MLKL. Furthermore, LPZ deteriorated cisplatin-induced inflammation, as revealed by the increased mRNA expression of pro-inflammatory factors including, NLRP3, IL-1ß, TNF-α and caspase 1, as well as neutrophil infiltration. Consistently, in in vitro study, LPZ increased HK-2 cell death and enhanced inflammation, compared with cisplatin treatment alone. Collectively, our results demonstrate that LPZ aggravates cisplatin-induced AKI, and necroptosis may be involved in the exacerbation of kidney damage.